The article argues that the notion that natural carbon storage solutions are only viable if they can store carbon forever is misguided. It highlights that natural ecosystems, such as forests and peatlands, have stored carbon reliably for millennia and can continue to do so through active management and risk mitigation. The article also notes that geological and direct air capture carbon removal methods are not without their own risks and challenges, including cost and scalability issues.
The article suggests that a diversified approach, combining technological removal with nature-based removal and reductions, is the best way to meet net-zero targets. It recommends that businesses and policymakers prioritize investing in natural carbon sinks, such as forest conservation projects, which can be supported by carbon credits. The article also emphasizes the importance of taking a science-led approach to carbon integrity, ensuring that carbon credits are assessed for durability and employ risk management strategies.
The article concludes that ignoring nature-based solutions due to concerns about durability is a risk, as it can slow the pace of global decarbonization and lead to reputational and financial risks for businesses. Instead, a balanced approach that includes both nature-based and technological solutions is needed to address the climate crisis.